Posts

NYC Council gets tough on tobacco, approves raising purchase age to 21

By Rande Iaboni, CNN
New York (CNN) — The New York City Council voted on Wednesday night to approve an anti-tobacco law that will raise the tobacco-purchasing age from 18 to 21.
In addition to the “Tobacco 21” bill, which includes electronic cigarettes, the council also approved a second bill, “Sensible Tobacco Enforcement.” It will prohibit discounts on tobacco products and increase enforcement on vendors who attempt to evade taxes.
Mayor Michael Bloomberg has 30 days to sign the bills into law. Given his previous support, that is likely to happen soon.
“By increasing the smoking age to 21, we will help prevent another generation from the ill health and shorter life expectancy that comes with smoking,” Bloomberg said in a statement on Wednesday.
“Tobacco 21” will take effect 180 days after it is enacted, according to the council’s news release.
New York City has now become the largest city to have an age limit as high as 21. Needham, Massachusetts, raised the sale age to 21 in 2005, according to the New York City Department of Health.
Neighboring states and counties have raised the tobacco sale age to 19, including New Jersey in 2005, the Department of Health said.
Raising the sales age “will protect teens and may prevent many people from ever starting to smoke,” Health Commissioner Thomas A. Farley, said in a statement after the vote.
While many lawmakers appeared to be applauding the bills, some younger New Yorkers were not so pleased.
“You’re an adult; you should be able to buy a pack of cigarettes,” one New Yorker told CNN affiliate NY1. “I mean, you can think for yourself.”
“I think it’s ridiculous,” another New Yorker said, “Let us be, let us live.”
This is another step in Bloomberg’s mission for healthier NYC lifestyles.
In September 2012, the Board of Health voted to ban the sale of sugary drinks in containers larger than 16 ounces in restaurants and other venues, a measure Bloomberg spearheaded.
The ban was later repealed by a New York State Supreme Court judge.
http://www.cnn.com/2013/10/30/us/new-york-city-tobacco-age/

Nationwide Fight Begins Over Raising Tobacco Age to 21

By 
New York City councilmen voted Wednesday to raise the legal age for purchasing tobacco from 18 to 21, a measure that will go into effect six months after it’s signed into law by Mayor Michael Bloomberg, a zealous anti-smoking advocate.
The Big Apple measure – which soared 35-10 through the city council – is part of a nationwide effort that seeks to make illegal the sale of tobacco to young adults.
In New Jersey, legislators are likely to debate a bill soon that would raise that state’s age limit to 21. New Jersey is currently tied for the highest statewide tobacco age limit, at 19.
Richard Codey, governor of New Jersey from 2004 to 2006, helped bump the state’s age limit from 18 to 19 less than 10 years ago. He’s now a state senator and the sponsor of new age limit legislation, which he is confident will prevail – and possibly help start a chain-reaction.
“Someone is going to read this in Connecticut or Illinois or somewhere else and go, yeah that’s a good idea,” Codey told U.S. News. “The only people who are opposed, obviously, are the tobacco companies. As far as I’m concerned, I’m on the side of the angels.”
Codey expects his bill to pass and take effect in early 2014. He hasn’t heard from Gov. Chris Christie, R-N.J., but he expects the prospective presidential candidate to consent to the change.
“Are some people going to get someone to buy cigarettes for them when they are not 21? Of course,” he said. “But there are other people who are not going to do that and obey the law and by the time they’re 21 are more mature and rational will realize that it’s not a good thing to do.”
Codey says his legislation was inspired by a phone conversation earlier this year with New York City Council Speaker Christine Quinn, then a candidate for mayor, who called him and shared her plan for the higher age limit. After some conversation, he joined on.
Codey’s not sure if his bill would affect electronic cigarette sales – as New York City’s law does – but he’s opposed to young smokers adopting that technology.
“It’s like someone who starts on marijuana, then they want a better high – it’s just a reality of life,” he said. Electronic cigarette advocates vehemently disagree with such arguments and say the vast majority of users are conventional smokers seeking a healthier alternative.
One of the largest national anti-tobacco organizations fully supports banning 18-to-21-year-olds from buying cigarettes.
“As states and localities have looked into this, we’ve begun to get involved,” said Danny McGoldrick, vice president for research at the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids.
McGoldrick said his organization generally supports a “tried and true trifecta” of anti-tobacco policies – higher taxes, public smoking bans and educational campaigns – but will also advocate for raising tobacco age limits to 21 in any jurisdiction considering it.
The Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids is currently supporting an attempt to raise the smoking age to 21 at the county level on Hawaii’s largest island and has been involved in generalized efforts to raise the age to 21 for around a year.
A fact sheet from the group says around 50 percent of smokers begin using cigarettes daily before they turn 18 and that more than 75 percent of adult smokers do so before they turn 21, arguing that cutting off access at a young age may drop future adult smoking rates.
“To the degree we wouldn’t be involved, it would only be a resource question,” McGoldrick said. “We certainly support it from a policy perspective. We’re just going to have to see what the landscape looks like in terms of the biggest opportunities for success.”
In New York City, one unhappy activist who organizes smokers to push back against tough laws says politicians can expect a black market boom with the new age limit.
“They are not stopping anyone in that age group who wants to smoke,” said Audrey Silk, founder of New York City Citizens Lobbying Against Smoker Harassment. “These young adults know very well where to get their cigarettes. The ones who have already been doing that will have more joining them to get their cigarettes from the ‘buttleggers,'” a term for smugglers who avoid high city taxes.
As the city government increased taxes on tobacco, Silk said, “a huge enterprise sprung up” and now many smokers have learned through word of mouth of illicit, less expensive cigarette dealers.
Silk, a former New York City cop, defiantly smokes cigarettes in city parks – deliberately violating Mayor Bloomberg’s ban by doing so – and her group won a rare victory Oct. 11 when a judge ruled against a statewide ban on smoking in parks.
“This one has no room for a lawsuit, unfortunately,” she concedes.
It’s unclear how city policy might change under Bloomberg’s successor, who will be selected in November. Neither Democrat Bill de Blasio nor Republican Joe Lhota have gone out of their way to advertise a position on the new age restriction.
“The lines have become blurred party wise because you can’t depend on any one party to defend our civil liberties,” Silk said. “My question to them is: Will you decline to accept the votes of this age group if they’re not smart enough [to decide whether or not to smoke]?”
Silk says it’s possible the age restriction will one day be reversed, but it’ll be an uphill climb.
“Prohibition [of alcohol] was reversed,” she said. “It took 13 years for that, so is it possible the age will be reduced one day? Yeah, it’s possible.” But, in the meantime, she admits “New York is a trendsetter” and will likely inspire young adult bans elsewhere.
http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2013/10/31/nationwide-fight-begins-over-raising-tobacco-age-to-21

Tobacco Marketing Costs Exceed Those of Prevention Efforts

By Marisa DeCandido – email
There’s been a statewide effort over the past several years to cut down on tobacco use in North Dakota. And state lawmakers now know exactly how much those prevention programs are costing.
It’s not easy for smokers in North Dakota to find a place to light up, and state lawmakers now know just how much it costs to keep it that way.
The Center for Tobacco Prevention and Control Policy says it spends about fifty-five dollars on each North Dakota Tobacco user. That money goes towards programs that help users break the habit.
“A great portion of the program is focused on preventing young people, youth and young adults, from ever using tobacco so we don’t have to spend as much on cessation, or getting them to quit later in life,” says Prom
And Prom says youth smoking rates have gone down in the last year. Even though the tobacco industry spends about one-hundred and ninety five dollars a year marketing to North Dakotans.
“It’s odd that we have a situation today where we have an industry, the tobacco industry, who promote a product that when used as intended kills. There’s really nothing normal about that. So we want to change that to where not using tobacco is the norm,” says Jeanne Prom, North Dakota Tobacco Prevention.
Prom presented these numbers on the same day that New York City proposed a law that would change the tobacco buying age from eighteen to twenty-one. But North Dakotans don’t thing that will happen here.
“North Dakota, at this time, we need to focus on our taxes and raising that, and that is going to make the biggest impact for stopping our youth from starting and helping others to quit,” says Kim Schneider, American Lung Association.
That’s because the tobacco tax here is only forty-four cents, one of the lowest in the country.
“We’ve spent a lot of time in the past year just educating again on the smoke-free law and on the tobacco tax. It’s a big issue in North Dakota,” says Schneider.
Tobacco prevention groups in the state say raising the tax is the next step towards fighting tobacco use.
For more information on how much smoking costs North Dakotans, visit breathend.com.
http://www.kumv.com/story/23842127/tobacco-marketing-costs-exceed-those-of-prevention-efforts

Affordable Care Act: Smoking sends health premiums higher

BY FRANCINE KNOWLES Staff Reporter

If you light up, prepare to get burned with higher premiums when buying insurance in the new health insurance marketplaces.
Under rules of the Affordable Care Act, in Illinois and most other states, insurers can charge smokers and other tobacco users as much as 50 percent more on their premiums due to the higher health risks they face compared to non-tobacco users.
In some cases, the surcharge wipes out the subsidy for which some smoking health plan enrollees would qualify in the marketplaces, said Karen Pollitz. She is senior fellow at Kaiser Family Foundation, a nonprofit focused on health-care issues.
“So you’d be back up to the sticker price,” Pollitz said. “The tobacco add-on is not covered by the tax-credit subsidies.”
Some insurers have imposed surcharges below 50 percent. Meanwhile Washington D.C. and states, including California, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and Vermont have prohibited insurers from applying a tobacco surcharge. Other states lowered the maximum surcharge allowed.
There were 1.8 million smokers in Illinois in 2012, or 18.6 percent of adults 18 and older, and nearly 240,000 residents used smokeless tobacco, according to the Illinois Department of Public Health.
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Illinois, among six insurers in the Illinois Health Insurance Marketplace, imposes a surcharge on tobacco users ranging from 10 percent at age 27 to 32 percent at age 54, according to BCBS spokeswoman Mary Ann Schultz.
“Generally, the effects of tobacco use are cumulative, so the costs increase with the length of time one has used tobacco,” she said in an email explaining the insurer’s rationale for the variance. “Since the length of time someone has used tobacco is reasonably well-correlated with age, the effect is for costs to increase with the member’s age. We don’t see many people in their later years who choose to start using tobacco.”
Coventry Health Care Inc. imposes a 20 percent surcharge on premiums for all smokers above age 21 who purchase insurance in the Illinois marketplace, Coventry spokesman Walter Cherniak Jr. said.
For a 55-year-old smoker choosing a Coventry silver PPO, the monthly cost would be $699.78 compared with $583.15 for a nonsmoker, he said. That’s $1,400 more a year for smokers.
Health Alliance Medical Plans, the insurance arm of Carle Foundation, imposes an 18 percent surcharge, said spokeswoman Kelli Anderson. Tobacco use is defined as using an average of four or more times per week in the past six months, excluding religious or ceremonial use, she said.
Humana Inc., Aetna Inc. and Land of Lincoln Health Inc. Co-op, all impose a 10 percent surcharge on smokers’ premiums, representatives said.
Consumers applying for insurance self-report whether they use tobacco. “They need to check off a box on the form,” said Schultz.
When making a policy purchase, insurance shoppers don’t have to prove whether they use tobacco. But smokers who might consider lying about tobacco use to cut their premium rates should think again.
“If a tobacco user does not check the box, and we later found out through a review of medical records or other reasons that he or she is a tobacco user, that is considered fraud,” Schultz said. “An insurance policy may be terminated if one commits fraud and does not share accurate medical information.”
Humana policyholders would be required to pay the difference in premium, according to spokesman Jeff Blunt.
Tobacco users who buy insurance have access to help in kicking the habit as part of their benefits. All health plans must cover 100 percent of the tab for smoking cessation programs with no co-pay, Pollitz said.
At Humana, members who participate in its smoking cessation programs who become tobacco-free are eligible for plan savings upon renewal, Blunt said.
http://www.suntimes.com/news/metro/23188991-418/affordable-care-act-smoking-sends-health-premiums-higher.html

Nine F-M businesses fail tobacco compliance check

By: Forum staff reports, INFORUM
FARGO – The Fargo and West Fargo police departments, with assistance from Fargo Cass Public Health, conducted tobacco compliance checks Wednesday.
In Fargo, 63 businesses were checked and seven failed, and in West Fargo, 11 businesses were checked and two failed.
Business that failed in Fargo were: Petro Serve USA, 2903 Main Ave.; Petro Travel/Fuel Store, 4510 19th Ave. S.; Stop-n-Go, 204 42nd St. S.; West Acres All Stop Amoco, 3441 13th Ave. S.; Fargo South Pointe, 3202 33rd St. S.; Holiday Station Store, 2755 S. Brandt Drive; and Stop-n-Go, 602 23rd St. S.
Business that failed in West Fargo included: Petro Serve USA, 239 Main Ave. W.; and West Fargo Truck Stop, 1021 Main Ave. W.
http://www.inforum.com/event/article/id/412889/group/News/

Smokers bypass new tax increase by rolling own cigarettes

Article by:  PAUL LEVY , Star Tribune
Minnesota smokers have found a way to beat the state’s new cigarette tax. They’re rolling their own.
Tobacco sales have slumped since the nation’s sixth-highest cigarette tax raised the price of a pack of cigarettes in Minnesota by $1.60 in July. But Twin Cities tobacco-shop owners say many customers are buying tobacco by the pouch — purchasing enough to roll at least two cartons’ worth of cigarettes for a fraction of the price.
The pouch tobacco is intended for cigarette rolling but is taxed differently because its wider cut classifies it as pipe tobacco, said Rich Lewis, owner of Lewis Pipe and Tobacco in downtown Minneapolis. A 1-pound pouch of rolling tobacco costs $23. Two cartons of cigarettes (20 packs) cost nearly $160, with the state excise tax now at $2.83 per pack.
“Most of my people are switching to roll your own,” said Yamen Haidari, general manager of Discount Tobacco in Fridley. “People tell me they’re getting two-and-a-half cartons’ worth of cigarettes for a little more than $20.”
A customer at the Tobacco Town shop in Anoka said she usually buys cigarettes by the carton. This week, she bought a pound of loose tobacco and two packs of cigarettes.
At Infinity Smokes in downtown Minneapolis, owner Tariq Hamouda said that he has seen an increase in loose tobacco sales and that “in neighborhoods and in the suburbs, they’re selling a lot more tobacco by the pound since the price of a pack went up to $8.”
The opening stems from a 2009 federal tax increase on cigarettes and cigarette tobacco that did not apply to pipe tobacco. “Any type of loose-leaf tobacco that was considered for cigarettes was relabeled as pipe tobacco, because it would not be covered under the federal increase,” said Mike Sheldon, a spokesman for Clearway Minnesota, an independent nonprofit that attempts to reduce tobacco use and secondhand smoke through research and collaboration. “There are taxes on other tobacco products, besides cigarettes, but they’re different.”
In Minnesota, the tax on loose tobacco is substantial — 95 percent of the wholesale price — but that still is generally less expensive than traditional cigarettes.
The Minnesota Department of Revenue has yet to determine whether the new taxes have sparked an increase in loose-tobacco sales, said department spokesman Ryan Brown. But Gary Foss, a clerk at Tobacco Outlet Depot in Minneapolis, says there’s no question. “We’re selling more pouches and e-cigarettes. It’s gotten very competitive.”
Tobacco sales, in general, were down last month in Minnesota. Lewis says his sales fell 75 percent when the tax initially took effect. Sales have rallied since, but not to the point they were before the tax increase, Lewis and other local store owners said.
It is too soon to say what the ultimate effect of the new cigarette tax will be on smoking in Minnesota, according to the Minnesota Management and Budget Department, which monitors the taxes collected on tobacco.
Dips in cigarette-related revenue are expected the first few months after a tax, said department spokesman John Pollard. August tobacco tax revenue was lower than expected, Pollard said.
Health-related, or perhaps cost-related, concerns over tobacco seemed to grow as sales dropped. The number of calls to Clearway Minnesota’s quit line increased 256 percent in the first week of July (compared to the same week in 2012). Online inquiries into quitting jumped 289 percent that week, Sheldon said.
There is also concern over the growing popularity of e-cigarettes. A recent survey showed one in five young people have used e-cigarettes the past 30 days, Sheldon said.
Some smokers are getting cigarettes out of state. Lewis says a customer in his 70s told him his sister ships him cartons of cigarettes from Missouri, where the excise tax is only 17 cents per pack, compared to Minnesota’s $2.83.
The only states with higher cigarette excise taxes than Minnesota are New York (the nation’s highest, at $4.35), Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut and Hawaii. Washington, D.C., has an excise tax of $2.86 per pack. In New York City, which has additional cigarette taxes, a pack of Marlboro Red cigarettes costs $14.50.
States surrounding Minnesota all have lower cigarette excise taxes, but Twin Cities smokers are not likely to flock to Wisconsin, where the cost is just 31 cents less per pack.
The most dramatic difference is in North Dakota, where the excise tax per pack is only 44 cents, or $2.39 less than in Minnesota.
“Why would anyone ever buy cigarettes in Moorhead?” Lewis asked.
http://www.startribune.com/politics/statelocal/223778101.html?page=1&c=y

DoD starts new effort to get troops, employees thinking healthy

By Patricia Kime
Staff Writer
Summertime refused to cede to fall Thursday in Falls Church, Va., as temperatures soared to 90 degrees and the Pentagon’s top doctor led a shorts-clad group on a fast-paced 1-mile run at the future Defense Health Agency headquarters.
The sweaty PT session marked the kickoff of the facility’s participation in the Defense Department’s “Healthy Base Initiative,” a nutrition and wellness program being field-tested at 14 military bases and offices nationwide.
The $6 million demonstration project is designed to assess the health of each facility’s population and improve it through healthy nutrition, physical activity and tobacco reduction.
Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs Dr. Jonathan Woodson said the Healthy Base Initiative will determine what health and fitness programs actually work and should be implemented DoD-wide.
“Society at large is dealing with the issue of health, nutrition and weight gain, and we need to take this on full force, having a good strategy to do better,” Woodson said.
The Defense Department spends $3.2 billion on obesity-related disease treatment and tobacco-related illnesses and treatment each year, said Charles Milam, principal director for military community and family policy.
A 2011 survey of active-duty members indicated that a quarter of troops smoked, while roughly 13 percent were classified as obese and 51 percent were considered overweight.
The numbers are even worse for military retirees: More than 40 percent of the youngest retirees, ages 40 to 49, are obese, according to DoD data.
Under the Healthy Base Initiative, participating facilities were given a baseline assessment of certain health metrics, including aggregate weight, tobacco use and fitness program participation.
Individual bases are left to determine how they will improve their numbers and the facilities will be reassessed after a year, said Capt. Kim Elenberg, director for medical readiness and training for the U.S. Public Health Service.
At Defense Health Headquarters, changes have included hosting a farmer’s market on Thursdays, banning smoking from the 44-acre campus, mapping out indoor walking trails in the building and an outdoor running path.
Officials acknowledge they face an uphill battle in changing habits, even on a day set aside to gin up enthusiasm for the program.
At the kickoff, fewer than 10 percent of the 3,000 employees at the Defense Health Headquarters showed up for the festivities. The most popular kiosks at the farmer’s market include the bread tent and the home-baked goods. Some employees dropped out of the run/walk.
To be fair, it was hot.
“It’s going to to take a while, but I do think it’s going to work,” said Navy Capt. Tonya Hall, vice chief of staff for the Bureau of Medicine, who participated in the festivities despite being in full uniform.
“Initiatives like this really go a long way to bringing this to people’s minds, because that’s half the battle, making people think about healthy habits,” she said.
Personnel at participating bases could see new programs, such as weight loss groups and fitness classes, revamped chow hall menus and new vending machine choices. Additional plans include an online assessment tool for personnel, family members and retirees to measure their overall health and map out plans for improvement.
What participating bases won’t see is the removal of base fast-food restaurants or snack foods from commissary shelves, Elenberg said.
“That’s not our goal. What we want to do is increase health literacy and offer healthy choices. If we can do that, if we can have farmer’s markets, teach parents how to pack a healthy lunch, encourage people to kick their tobacco habits, we can succeed,” she said.
The participating bases and facilities are: Fort Bragg, N.C.; Fort Sill, Okla.; Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii; Submarine Base New London Conn.; Mountain Home Air Force Base, Idaho; Yokota Air Base, Japan; Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center, Twentynine Palms, Calif.; Marine Corps Base Quantico, Va.; Coast Guard Air Station Cape Cod, Mass.; March Air Reserve Base, Calif.; Fort Meade, Md.; Camp Dodge, Iowa; and the Defense Logistics Agency, Fort Belvoir, Va.
http://www.navytimes.com/article/20130913/NEWS/309130026/DoD-starts-new-effort-get-troops-employees-thinking-healthy

CDC’s Anti-Smoking Ad Campaign Spurred Over 100,000 Smokers to Quit; Media Campaigns Must be Expanded Nationally and in the States

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:    September 9, 2013
Statement of Susan M. Liss
Executive Director, Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids
WASHINGTON, DC – Year one of the federal government’s “Tips from Former Smokers” national advertising campaign exceeded all expectations, driving 1.6 million smokers to try to quit and helping more than 100,000 to succeed, according to a study published today in the medical journal The Lancet.  The 2012 campaign, conducted by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), also inspired millions of nonsmokers to encourage friends and family members to quit smoking.  Researchers estimated that, by quitting, former smokers added more than a third of a million years of life to the U.S. population.  The Tips campaign was the first ever federally-funded national media campaign aimed at reducing smoking.
This study provides powerful, real-world evidence that media campaigns work, they reduce smoking and they save lives.  They are also cost-effective investments that can help reduce tobacco-related health care costs, which total $96 billion a year in the United States.
The CDC’s campaign was highly successful despite lasting only three months and costing only $54 million – less than 0.7 percent of the $8.8 billion the tobacco industry spends annually to market its deadly and addictive products.  To win the fight against tobacco, we need more media campaigns like this, both nationally and in the states.  Fortunately, the CDC recognizes this and conducted a second round of its campaign earlier this year.  Similar national campaigns must be continued and expanded in the future.
It is also critical that the states increase funding for media campaigns as part of a comprehensive program to prevent kids from smoking and help smokers quit.  The states collect nearly $26 billion a year in revenue from the 1998 tobacco settlement and tobacco taxes, but spend less than two percent of it – $459.5 million in fiscal year 2013 – on programs to reduce tobacco use, including media campaigns.  They have cut funding for such programs by 36 percent in recent years.
To counter the marketing barrage of the tobacco industry and accelerate smoking declines in the U.S., both the federal government and the states must increase and sustain their commitment to fighting tobacco use, including with media campaigns.  Campaigns to reduce smoking must be as aggressive and year-round as the tobacco industry’s promotion of its deadly products.
The success of the CDC’s media campaign also illustrates the value of the Prevention and Public Health Fund, which was created by the health care reform law and provided funding for the campaign.  It underscores the public health fund’s enormous potential to improve health and reduce health care costs in the U.S.
The new study adds to the already substantial scientific evidence that mass media campaigns prevent children from smoking and help smokers quit, saving lives and health care dollars. Public health authorities including the Surgeon General, the National Cancer Institute, the Institute of Medicine and the CDC have all examined the evidence and concluded that these campaigns work.
States that have conducted extensive media campaigns as part of their tobacco prevention programs – including California, Florida, New York and Washington – have reduced smoking rates faster and to lower levels than the nation as a whole.  Florida recently reported that its high school smoking rate fell to 8.6 percent in 2013, far below most states and the entire nation (the national rate was 15.8 percent in the most recent equivalent national survey, conducted in 2011).  If every state reduced youth smoking to the same low rate as Florida, there would be 1.6 million fewer youth smokers in the U.S.
Research indicates the most effective anti-smoking media campaigns evoke strong emotions and realistically depict the terrible health consequences of tobacco use – just as the CDC ads do.  We applaud the CDC for its strong leadership in the fight against tobacco use.  We also thank the courageous former smokers who shared their heartbreaking health struggles with the entire country, telling the harsh truth about how devastating and unglamorous cigarette smoking truly is.
While the U.S. has made enormous progress in reducing smoking, tobacco use remains the nation’s number one cause of preventable death, killing more than 400,000 Americans every year.  Media campaigns are an essential tool in winning the fight against the tobacco epidemic.
Smokers can get help in quitting by calling 1-800-QUIT-NOW or visiting www.smokefree.gov.

Underage tobacco sales reported at record lows

By MICHAEL FELBERBAUM
AP Tobacco Writer
RICHMOND, Va. (AP) — New statistics show that the sale of tobacco to minors in the U.S. were held near all-time lows last year under a federal-state inspection program intended to curb underage usage.
The violation rate of tobacco sales to underage youth at retailers nationwide has fallen from about 40 percent in 1997 to 9.1 percent in the last fiscal year, according to a Substance Abuse and Mental Health Administration report released Tuesday. The rate, which reached an all-time low of 8.5 percent in 2011, is based on the results of random, unannounced inspections conducted at stores to see whether they’d sell tobacco products to a customer under the age of 18.
A U.S. Surgeon General’s report issued last year found that more needs to be done to prevent young Americans from using tobacco, including stricter smoking bans and higher taxes on tobacco products. According to that report, almost one in five high school-aged children smokes. That’s down from earlier decades, but the rate of decline has slowed. It also said that more than 80 percent of smokers begin by age 18 and 99 percent of adult smokers in the U.S. start by age 26.
The inspection program, named for late U.S. Rep. Mike Synar of Oklahoma, is a federal mandate requiring each state to document that the rate of tobacco sales to minors is no more than 20 percent at the risk losing millions in federal funds for alcohol and other drug abuse prevention and treatment services.
Frances Harding, director of the federal agency’s Center for Substance Abuse, said that while the program has made “remarkable strides,” far more needs to be done to curb underage tobacco use.
In the last fiscal year, 33 states and Washington, D.C., reported a retailer violation rate below 10 percent, according to the Tuesday report. It was the seventh time that no state was found to be out of compliance. Maine reported the lowest rate of 1.8 percent, and Oregon reported the highest rate at 17.9 percent.
The latest federal data shows that about 14 percent of minors reported buying their own cigarettes in stores in 2011, down from 19 percent a decade earlier, suggesting that children may instead be getting their cigarettes and tobacco products from places other than convenience stores or gas stations.
http://minnesota.publicradio.org/display/web/2013/08/27/health/underage-tobacco-sales-reported-at-record-lows

E-cigarettes health: Carcinogens found in e-cigarettes a danger, study finds

E-cigarettes health reports recently reveal that this seemingly “healthy” cigarette alternative may not be as good for users as many would like to believe, and that they might even include a similar number of dangerous carcinogens as regular cigarettes when smoking, Yahoo! reports this Tuesday, Aug. 27. The study highlights in its finding that researchers found that up to 3 out of 10 e-cigarettes had levels of acrolein and formaldehyde that were almost the same as those in standard cigarettes, a shocking discovery for some.
The e-cigarettes health study comes at a time when these electronic cigarettes have become an increasingly well-known substitute for smokers (many of whom may be trying to quit). Although the device also uses heat which vaporizes the nicotine into the body when inhaled, it does not contain the unhealthy tobacco.
Smokers that want to try to avoid some of the dangers and health risks associated with smoking, or in the process of kicking the bad habit, often use e-cigarettes as another option to still get their nicotine fix, while avoiding many of the serious health risks linked to regular cigarette smoking, most notably cancer.
Yet France’s National Consumer Institute magazine released some shocking new findings this Monday, reporting that a majority of e-cigarettes on the market today still hold “a significant quantity of carcinogenic molecules” that could pose a similar danger to these electronic smokers.
The study discovered via its researchers that 3 out of every 10 e-cigarettes still contained high levels of some carcinogenic substances, including that of formaldehyde and acrolein.
Though a banning may not be in order, raising public health awareness or putting limits to the e-cigarettes might be a sensible option, notes the magazine’s editor-in-chief
“This is not a reason to ban them, but to place them under better control.”
Added another statement on the rising popularity of e-cigarettes and the highly believed health benefits of the substituent device in terms of this new study:
“E-cigarettes are more than just a fad,” reads a piece from the report. “E-Cigarettes’ appeal stems from a variety of perceived advantages over traditional cigarettes, most commonly the perceptions that e-cigarettes are healthier, cheaper, and can be used almost anywhere … Yet they may have some hidden dangers, including those of carcinogens and other dangers.”
Do you have any insight into the e-cigarette health news? Do you agree with the study’s finding that dangerous carcinogens may lurk in these seemingly more healthy e-cigarettes?
http://www.examiner.com/article/e-cigarettes-health-carcinogens-found-e-cigarettes-a-danger-study-finds