Are e-cigarettes dangerous?

By Harold P. Wimmer
Editor’s note: Harold P. Wimmer is the president and CEO of the American Lung Association.
(CNN) — For the makers of electronic cigarettes, today we are living in the Wild West — a lawless frontier where they can say or do whatever they want, no matter what the consequences. They are free to make unsubstantiated therapeutic claims and include myriad chemicals and additives in e-cigarettes.
Big Tobacco desperately needs new nicotine addicts and is up to its old tricks to make sure it gets them. E-cigarettes are being aggressively marketed to children with flavors like Bazooka Bubble Gum, Cap’n Crunch and Cotton Candy. Joe Camel was killed in the 1990s, but cartoon characters are back promoting e-cigarettes.
Many e-cigarettes look like Marlboro or Camel cigarettes. Like their old-Hollywood counterparts, glamorous and attractive celebrities are appearing on TV promoting specific e-cigarette brands. Free samples are even being handed out on street corners.

A report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention shows the promotion of e-cigarettes is reaching our children with alarming success. In just one year, e-cigarette use doubled among high school and middle school students, and 1 in 10 high school students have used an e-cigarette. Altogether, 1.78 million middle and high school students nationwide use e-cigarettes.

The three largest cigarette companies are all selling e-cigarettes. Because tobacco use kills more than 400,000 people each year and thousands more successfully quit, the industry needs to attract and addict thousands of children each day, as well as keep adults dependent to maintain its huge profits.
Nicotine is a highly addictive substance, whether delivered in a conventional cigarette or their electronic counterparts. The potential harm from exposure to secondhand emissions from e-cigarettes is unknown. Two initial studies have found formaldehyde, benzene and tobacco-specific nitrosamines (a well-known carcinogen) coming from those secondhand emissions. We commend New York City recently for banning the use of e-cigarettes indoors.
No e-cigarette has been approved by the FDA as a safe and effective product to help people quit smoking. Yet many companies are making claims that e-cigarettes help smokers quit. When smokers are ready to quit, they should call 1-800-QUIT NOW or talk with their doctors about using one of the seven FDA-approved medications proven to be safe and effective in helping smokers quit.
According to one study, there are 250 different e-cigarette brands for sale in the U.S. today. With so many brands, there is likely to be wide variation in the chemicals — intended and unintended — that each contain.
In 2009, lab tests conducted by the FDA found detectable levels of toxic cancer-causing chemicals — including an ingredient used in anti-freeze — in two leading brands of e-cigarettes and 18 various e-cigarette cartridges.
There is no safe form of tobacco. Right now, the public health and medical community or consumers have no way of knowing what chemicals are contained in an e-cigarette or what the short and long term health implications might be.
Commonsense regulation of e-cigarettes by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration is urgently needed. In the absence of meaningful oversight, the tobacco industry has free rein to promote their products as “safe” without any proof.
A proposal to regulate e-cigarettes and other tobacco products has been under review at the White House Office of Management and Budget since October 1, 2013. The Obama administration must move forward with these rules to protect the health of everyone, especially our children.
The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of Harold P. Wimmer.
http://www.cnn.com/2014/01/06/opinion/wimmer-ecigarette-danger/

Fargo City Commissioners look to update tobacco ordinances

Fargo, ND (WDAY TV) – Fargo city commissioners are taking a step to stop the increase of e-cigarette use among minors.
Right now, electronic cigarettes are not regulated by the FDA, meaning there are no laws about their use.
In the last year, the percentage of US middle and high school students who reported using them has doubled.
Even though most Fargo businesses have their own rules prohibiting minors, legally anyone can buy them.
Monday night the city council plans to update its tobacco ordinances to include e-cigarettes and all its parts; so that no one can sell to anyone under 18, and minors cannot purchase them.
Holly Scott/Tobacco Prevention Coordinator: “I would venture a guess that most places would not sell to a minor, but by having it written in city ordinance, that way we just ensure that all businesses are following the same set of rules, in that, kinds can’t have access to these products.”
http://www.wday.com/event/article/id/92153/

US is marking 50th anniversary of surgeon general report that turned the tide against smoking

Article by: MIKE STOBBE , Associated Press
ATLANTA — Fifty years ago, ashtrays seemed to be on every table and desk. Athletes and even Fred Flintstone endorsed cigarettes in TV commercials. Smoke hung in the air in restaurants, offices and airplane cabins. More than 42 percent of U.S. adults smoked, and there was a good chance your doctor was among them.
The turning point came on Jan. 11, 1964. It was on that Saturday morning that U.S. Surgeon General Luther Terry released an emphatic and authoritative report that said smoking causes illness and death — and the government should do something about it.
In the decades that followed, warning labels were put on cigarette packs, cigarette commercials were banned, taxes were raised and new restrictions were placed on where people could light up.
“It was the beginning,” said Kenneth Warner, a University of Michigan public health professor who is a leading authority on smoking and health.
It was not the end. While the U.S. smoking rate has fallen by more than half to 18 percent, that still translates to more than 43 million smokers. Smoking is still far and away the leading preventable cause of death in the U.S. Some experts predict large numbers of Americans will puff away for decades to come.
Nevertheless, the Terry report has been called one of the most important documents in U.S. public health history, and on its 50th anniversary, officials are not only rolling out new anti-smoking campaigns but reflecting on what the nation did right that day.
The report’s bottom-line message was hardly revolutionary. Since 1950, head-turning studies that found higher rates of lung cancer in heavy smokers had been appearing in medical journals. A widely read article in Reader’s Digest in 1952, “Cancer by the Carton,” contributed to the largest drop in cigarette consumption since the Depression. In 1954, the American Cancer Society announced that smokers had a higher cancer risk.
But the tobacco industry fought back. Manufacturers came out with cigarettes with filters that they claimed would trap toxins before they settled into smokers’ lungs. And in 1954, they placed a full-page ad in hundreds of newspapers in which they argued that research linking their products and cancer was inconclusive.
It was a brilliant counter-offensive that left physicians and the public unsure how dangerous smoking really was. Cigarette sales rebounded.
In 1957 and 1959, Surgeon General Leroy Burney issued statements that heavy smoking causes lung cancer. But they had little impact.
Amid pressure from health advocates, President John F. Kennedy’s surgeon general, Dr. Luther Terry, announced in 1962 that he was convening an expert panel to examine all the evidence and issue a comprehensive, debate-settling report. To ensure the panel was unimpeachable, he let the tobacco industry veto any proposed members it regarded as biased.
Surveys indicated a third to a half of all physicians smoked tobacco products at the time, and the committee reflected the culture: Half its 10 members were smokers, who puffed away during committee meetings. Terry himself was a cigarette smoker.
Dr. Eugene Guthrie, an assistant surgeon general, helped persuade Terry to kick the habit a few months before the press conference releasing the report.
“I told him, ‘You gotta quit that. I think you can get away with a pipe — if you don’t do it openly.’ He said, ‘You gotta be kidding!’ I said, ‘No, I’m not. It just wouldn’t do. If you smoke any cigarettes, you better do it in a closet,'” Guthrie recalled in a recent interview with The Associated Press.
The press conference was held on a Saturday partly out of concern about its effect on the stock market. About 200 reporters attended.
The committee said cigarette smoking clearly did cause lung cancer and was responsible for the nation’s escalating male cancer death rate. It also said there was no valid evidence filters were reducing the danger. The committee also said — more vaguely — that the government should address the problem.
“This was front-page news, and every American knew it,” said Robin Koval, president of Legacy, an anti-smoking organization.
Cigarette consumption dropped a whopping 15 percent over the next three months but then began to rebound. Health officials realized it would take more than one report.
In 1965, Congress required cigarette packs to carry warning labels. Two years later, the Federal Communications Commission ordered TV and radio stations to provide free air time for anti-smoking public service announcements. Cigarette commercials were banned in 1971.
Still, progress was slow. Warner recalled teaching at the University of Michigan in 1972, when nearly half the faculty members at the school of public health were smokers. He was one of them.
“I felt like a hypocrite and an idiot,” he said. But smoking was still the norm, and it was difficult to quit, he said.
The 1970s also saw the birth of a movement to protect nonsmokers from cigarette fumes, with no-smoking sections on airplanes, in restaurants and in other places. Those eventually gave way to complete smoking bans. Cigarette machines disappeared, cigarette taxes rose, and restrictions on the sale of cigarettes to minors got tougher.
Tobacco companies also came under increasing legal attack. In the biggest case of them all, more than 40 states brought lawsuits demanding compensation for the costs of treating smoking-related illnesses. Big Tobacco settled in 1998 by agreeing to pay about $200 billion and curtail marketing of cigarettes to youths.
In 1998, while the settlement was being completed, tobacco executives appeared before Congress and publicly acknowledged for the first time that their products can cause lung cancer and be addictive.
Experts agree the Terry report clearly triggered decades of changes that whittled the smoking rate down. But it was based on data that was already out there. Why, then, did it make such a difference?
For one thing, the drumbeat about the dangers of smoking was getting louder in 1964, experts said. But the way the committee was assembled and the carefully neutral manner in which it reached its conclusion were at least as important, said Dr. Tim McAfee, director of the Office on Smoking and Health at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
At the same time, he and others said any celebration of the anniversary must be tempered by the size of the problem that still exists.
Each year, an estimated 443,000 people die prematurely from smoking or exposure to secondhand smoke, and 8.6 million live with a serious illness caused by smoking, according to the CDC.
Donald Shopland finds that depressing.
Fifty years ago, he was a 19-year-old who smoked two packs a day while working as a clerk for the surgeon general’s committee. He quit cigarettes right after the 1964 report came out, and went on to a long and distinguished public health career in which he wrote or edited scores of books and reports on smoking’s effects.
“We should be much further along than we are,” the Georgia retiree lamented.
http://www.startribune.com/lifestyle/health/238716101.html?page=all&prepage=1&c=y#continue

E-Cigarettes: Separating Fiction From Fact

By Serena Gordon
HealthDay Reporter
It’s the new year, a time when a smokers’ thoughts often turn to quitting.
Some people may use that promise of a fresh start to trade their tobacco cigarettes for an electronic cigarette, a device that attempts to mimic the look and feel of a cigarette and often contains nicotine.
Here’s what you need to know about e-cigarettes:
What is an e-cigarette?
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) describes an e-cigarette as a battery-operated device that turns nicotine, flavorings and other chemicals into a vapor that can be inhaled. The ones that contain nicotine offer varying concentrations of nicotine. Most are designed to look like a tobacco cigarette, but some look like everyday objects, such as pens or USB drives, according to the FDA.
How does an e-cigarette work?
“Nicotine or flavorings are dissolved into propylene glycol usually, though it’s hard to know for sure because they’re not regulated,” explained smoking cessation expert Dr. Gordon Strauss, founder of QuitGroups and a psychiatrist at Lenox Hill Hospital in New York City. “Then, when heated, you can inhale the vapor.”
The process of using an e-cigarette is called “vaping” rather than smoking, according to Hilary Tindle, an assistant professor of medicine and director of the tobacco treatment service at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. She said that people who use electronic cigarettes are called “vapers” rather than smokers.
Although many e-cigarettes are designed to look like regular cigarettes, both Tindle and Strauss said they don’t exactly replicate the smoking experience, particularly when it comes to the nicotine delivery. Most of the nicotine in e-cigarettes gets into the bloodstream through the soft tissue of your cheeks (buccal mucosa) instead of through your lungs, like it does with a tobacco cigarette.
“Nicotine from a regular cigarette gets to the brain much quicker, which may make them more addictive and satisfying,” Strauss said.
Where can e-cigarettes be used?
“People want to use e-cigarettes anywhere they can’t smoke,” Strauss said. “I sat next to someone on a plane who was using an e-cigarette. He was using it to get nicotine during the flight.” But he noted that just where it’s OK to use an e-cigarette — indoors, for instance? — remains unclear.
Wherever they’re used, though, he said it’s unlikely that anyone would get more than a miniscule amount of nicotine secondhand from an e-cigarette.
Can an e-cigarette help people quit smoking?
That, too, seems to be an unanswered question. Tindle said that “it’s too early to tell definitively that e-cigarettes can help people quit.”
A study published in The Lancet in September was the first moderately sized, randomized and controlled trial of the use of e-cigarettes to quit smoking, she said. It compared nicotine-containing e-cigarettes to nicotine patches and to e-cigarettes that simply contained flavorings. The researchers found essentially no differences in the quit rates for the products after six months of use.
“E-cigarettes didn’t do worse than the patch, and there were no differences in the adverse events,” she said. “I would be happy if it turned out to be a safe and effective alternative for quitting, but we need a few more large trials for safety and efficacy.”
Strauss noted that “although we can’t say with certainty that e-cigarettes are an effective way to quit, people are using them” for that purpose. “Some people have told me that e-cigarettes are like a godsend,” he said.
Former smoker Elizabeth Phillips would agree. She’s been smoke-free since July 2012 with the help of e-cigarettes, which she used for about eight months after giving up tobacco cigarettes.
“E-cigarettes allowed me to gradually quit smoking without completely removing myself from the physical actions and social experience associated with smoking,” Phillips said. “I consider my e-cigarette experience as a baby step that changed my life.”
Are e-cigarettes approved or regulated by the government?
E-cigarettes are not currently regulated in a specific way by the FDA. The agency would like to change this, however, and last April filed a request for the authority to regulate e-cigarettes as a tobacco product.
The attorneys general of 40 states agree that electronic cigarettes should be regulated and sent a letter to the FDA in September requesting oversight of the products. They contend that e-cigarettes are being marketed to children; some brands have fruit and candy flavors or are advertising with cartoon characters. And, they note that the health effects of e-cigarettes have not been well-studied, especially in children.
Are e-cigarettes dangerous?
“It’s not the nicotine in cigarettes that kills you, and the nicotine in e-cigarettes probably won’t really hurt you either, but again, it hasn’t been studied,” Strauss said. “Is smoking something out of a metal and plastic container safer than a cigarette? Cigarettes are already so bad for you it’s hard to imagine anything worse. But, it’s a risk/benefit analysis. For a parent trying to quit, we know that secondhand smoke is a huge risk to kids, so if an electronic cigarette keeps you from smoking, maybe you’d be helping kids with asthma or saving babies.”
But on the flip side, he said, in former smokers, using an e-cigarette could trigger the urge to smoke again.
The other big concern is children using e-cigarettes.
“More and more middle and high school kids are using e-cigarettes,” Tindle said. “Some are smoking conventional cigarettes, too. The latest data from the CDC found the rate of teens reporting ever having used an e-cigarette doubled in just a year. We could be creating new nicotine addicts. We don’t know what the addictive properties of e-cigarettes are,” she added.
“It’s shocking that they’ve been allowed to sell to minors,” Tindle said.
More information
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has more about electronic cigarettes.
http://health.usnews.com/health-news/news/articles/2014/01/03/e-cigarettes-separating-fiction-from-fact

Nicotine Poisoning Blamed on E-cigs

BY 
Threats of nicotine poisoning are now serving as the catalyst of new protests against electronic cigarettes, prompting some countries to consider regulating or banning the e-cigs.  The European Union is currently considering either bans or regulation, and some places such as Spain have already banned the e-cigs.
Some cities in the US are also considering bans or stronger regulations on the products.   New York, Chicago, and Oklahoma City are also seeking regulation with some cities choosing to treat the e-cigs as tobacco products, even though they do not contain any tobacco.  New York just recently passed a ban on e-cig product usage in public places.
E-cigs are electronic cigarettes that feature a heating element.  They contain propylene glycol which produces a vapor when heated and also have a flavoring liquid.  The liquids come in a variety of flavors and contain different levels of nicotine.
The e-cigs are used by people who are trying to quit smoking tobacco, and many people see them as a safer alternative to regular cigarettes which contain several carcinogenic compounds.
The liquids used for e-cigs contain concentrated amounts of nicotine and are being blamed for poisoning children who accidently drink the fluid.  In May 2013, an Israeli 2 year old reportedly died after drinking the fluid and ingesting a lethal dose of nicotine.
In Sweden, 29 cases of nicotine poisoning were attributed to e-cigs last year.  Due to less strict requirements, e-cig users are able to use in more places, which may be leading to accidental overdoses as users are not required to wait for a smoking break.
Nicotine poisoning can exhibit many side effects such as nausea and vomiting, abdominal cramps, agitation and weakness.  Severe cases can lead to coma and respiratory failure.
Nicotine has an average lethal dosage of 0.5 to 1 milligram per kilogram in body weight for humans.  It is easily absorbed through the skin.  It has a half life of approximately two hours.
Most overdoses happen with simultaneous use of nicotine products, such as smoking and use of a patch at the same time.
Emergency treatment of nicotine poisoning includes administering activated charcoal and gastric lavage.
Nicotine has been used and valued for centuries due to its positive effects.  It can relieve depression, suppress appetites and can help with mental focus.  Nicotine is widely believed to be highly addictive, although some theories suggest that pure nicotine is not addictive, but it is only addictive when used in tobacco form.
No matter what the true reason, tobacco usage is highly addictive and has been attributed to several health problems, such as strokes and lung cancer.  The e-cigs are seen as a safer alternative by many users and some health officials have even come out in favor of e-cigs over regular tobacco.
Other officials claim that e-cigs are unregulated and have not been fully researched for potential side effects.  Authorities claim that the health hazards from inhaling the propylene glycol mist are unknown.
Some cities that are considering bans on e-cigs are concerned that they may be used by teenagers as a gateway into cigarette smoking. According to a youth survey by the US Center for Disease Control, 10 percent of high school students have tried using e-cigs.  CDC official called the results troubling.  Opponents blamed the increase in teenage usage on advertising featuring popular celebrities such as Jenny McCarthy and Courtney Love touting the benefits of the e-cigs.
Proponents of the e-cigs point out that the products are safer than the traditional cigarettes and say that many people have been able to stop using traditional tobacco thanks to the use of e-cigs.  Many satisfied customers point that the e-cigs have been their only alternative as nicotine patches are costly, and smoking cessation pills such as Chantix can have severe side effects such as suicidal thoughts.
http://www.newschanneldaily.com/nicotine-poisoning-blamed-e-cigs/2316/kb-hallmark/

Triple tobacco taxes? Researchers say yes to save 200M lives

By Cheryl K. Chumley – The Washington Times
Tripling tobacco taxes would save 200 million smokers around the world from premature deaths over the course of the next century, researchers say.
That’s because the higher costs would make it nearly impossible for many to afford the habit and at the same time serve as a deterrent to youth from taking their first puffs, scientists said, AOL Money reported.
The scientists said they reviewed 63 different studies about the causes and effects of tobacco smoking around the world — and discovered a link between lower smoking statistics and higher priced product. Raising the price of cigarettes by 50 percent lowers the rate of smoking by about a fifth, the scientists found.
So now study authors suggest that prices of tobacco should be raised significantly, by boosting taxes of the product by three times the present amount.
“The two certainties in life are death and taxes,” said study co-author Professor Sir Richard Peto, from the nonprofit Cancer Research UK, in the AOL Money report. “We want higher tobacco taxes and fewer tobacco deaths. It would help children not to start, and it would help many adults to stop while there’s still time.”
They estimate the death rate could be cut by almost half if the tax rate increase is accepted.
“Globally, about half of all young men and one in 10 of all young women become smokers and, particularly in developing countries, relatively few quit,” Mr. Peto said, in AOL Money. “If they keep smoking, about half will be killed by it. But if they stop before 40, they’ll reduce their risk of dying form tobacco by 90 percent.”
The researchers say that in the European Union alone, 100,000 lives per year of those under the age of 70 could be saved by doubling the cost of cigarettes.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/jan/2/triple-tobacco-taxes-researchers-say-save-lives/

Trebling [tripling] tobacco tax 'could prevent 200 million early deaths'

By: Kate Kelland, Reuters
LONDON (Reuters) – Trebling [tripling] tobacco tax globally would cut smoking by a third and prevent 200 million premature deaths this century from lung cancer and other diseases, researchers said on Wednesday.
In a review in the New England Journal of Medicine, scientists from the charity Cancer Research UK (CRUK) said hiking taxes by a large amount per cigarette would encourage people to quit smoking altogether rather than switch to cheaper brands, and help stop young people from taking up the habit.
As well as causing lung cancer, which is often fatal, smoking is the largest cause of premature death from chronic conditions like heart disease, stroke and high blood pressure.
Tobacco kills around 6 million people a year now, according to the World Health Organization (WHO), and that toll is expected to rise above 8 million a year by 2030 if nothing is done to curb smoking rates.
Richard Peto, an epidemiologist at CRUK who led the study, said aggressively increasing tobacco taxes would be especially effective in poorer and middle-income countries where the cheapest cigarettes are relatively affordable.
Of the 1.3 billion people around the world who smoke, most live in poorer countries where often governments have also not yet introduced smoke-free legislation.
But increasing tobacco tax would also be effective in richer countries, Peto said, citing evidence from France, which he said halved cigarette consumption from 1990 to 2005 by raising taxes well above inflation.
“The two certainties in life are death and taxes. We want higher tobacco taxes and fewer tobacco deaths,” he said in a statement. “It would help children not to start, and it would help many adults to stop while there’s still time.”
While smokers lose at least 10 years of life, quitting before age 40 avoids more than 90 percent of the increased health risk run by people who continue smoking. Stopping before age 30 avoids more than 97 percent of the risk.
Governments around the world have agreed to prioritize reducing premature deaths from cancer and other chronic diseases in the United Nations General Assembly and in the WHO’s World Health Assembly in 2013. They also agreed to a target of reducing smoking by a third by 2025.
The CRUK analysis found that doubling the price of cigarettes in the next decade through increased taxes would cut worldwide consumption by about a third by that target, and at the same time increase annual government revenues from tobacco by a third from around $300 billion to $400 billion.
This extra income, the researchers suggested, could be spent on boosting health care budgets.
Peto noted that the international tobacco industry makes about $50 billion in profits each year, saying this equated to “approximately $10,000 per death from smoking”.
“Worldwide, around half a billion children and adults under the age of 35 are already – or soon will be – smokers, and many will be hooked on tobacco for life. So there’s an urgent need for governments to find ways to stop people starting and to help smokers give up,” said Harpal Kumar, CRUK’s chief executive.
He said the study, which examined 63 research papers on the causes and consequences of tobacco use in many different countries, showed tobacco taxes are “a hugely powerful lever”.
They are also potentially a triple win, Kumar said, cutting the number of people who smoke and die from their addiction, reducing the health care burden and costs linked to smoking and at the same time increasing government income.
(Reporting by Kate Kelland; Editing by Janet Lawrence)
http://www.grandforksherald.com/event/article/id/281348/

Arizona fire officials see increased fire danger with e-cigarettes

Lauren Gilger, ABC15.com
PHOENIX – As electronic cigarettes grow in popularity, so do the number of fires they start. Phoenix Fire Department officials say they’ve noticed the increase and want families to know about the potential danger.
AN ARIZONA COUPLE’S LOSS
“I got to the bedroom door and it was just a huge fire,” Vicki Orman said, remembering the fire that burned down much of her Phoenix home in October.
“I was traumatized,” she said. “You see your belongings, your home on fire. It’s terrible.”
Vicki and her husband, Dale, lived in that house for 18 years, they said. But it all changed one day after Vicki plugged in her electronic cigarette and left it charging.
“The fire was confined to the master bedroom, but the rest of the house had quite a bit of smoke and water damage,” Dale explained.
In all, the damage was estimated to be more than $100,000, according to fire records.
Fire officials say the cartridge of the e-cigarette overheated while it was plugged into the charger, sparking the fire.
Vicki said she heard the smoke detector and found the fire in their bedroom.
After the fire, Vicki was in shock.
“I didn’t know what to do,” Vicki said, “What do you do? Where am I going to go? What about my animals?”
She and her three dogs made it out safely, but Dale suffered smoke inhalation and spent three days in the hospital, he said.
FIRE OFFICIALS SEE A PATTERN
“These things are causing fires,” said Phoenix Fire Department Captain and Arson Investigator Gary Hernandez.
He responded to the fire at the Orman’s house, but this wasn’t the first e-cigarette-related fire he’s seen.
“They had plugged this in, in the charger, put in on top of the bed, they left,” he said. “That’s a very dangerous thing.”
Electronic cigarettes use a battery to heat up the steam users inhale to get the nicotine and various flavors.
Vicki says she used the name brand Smokin’ T. They’re re-usable.
Sister station ABC15 contacted the manufacturer of Smokin’ T e-cigarettes, Smokin’ Time, but they didn’t respond to numerous messages.
“I’m not sure why it’s happening and why they’re malfunctioning,” Hernandez said. “But, I think you can be keenly aware that these can malfunction and these can cause a fire.”
There have been several report of e-cigarette-related fires involving various name brands across the country, including at least four in the Phoenix area.
“I’M ANGRY”
“They shouldn’t explode,” Dale said. He said he looked at the instructions that came with the e-cigarette and didn’t see any warning against leaving it to charge for a specific amount of time.
It’s been two months since the fire and the Ormans and their dogs are still living in a hotel room.
“I’m angry that they put out a product that is so dangerous,” Vicki said. “I am angry that I lost some personal property that I can no longer replace…I am angry at myself that I didn’t know better.”
She says she would like to see the manufacturer stop selling this product until they’ve figured out why this happened.
“There’s obviously something wrong,” she said, “We are not the only ones that this has happened to.”
Vicki said she and her husband are considering a lawsuit against the company that makes the e-cigarette that started their fire.
CHECK YOUR SMOKE ALARM
Fire officials say there was one thing that saved the Ormans that day: their smoke detector.
It’s easy to forget, so make sure you check your smoke detector to make sure it’s working.
The FDA is in the process of compiling regulations to oversee electronic cigarettes.
http://www.theindychannel.com/news/u-s-world/arizona-fire-officials-see-increased-fire-danger-with-e-cigarettes

Be it resolved to quit ….

By KAREN HERZOG, Bismarck Tribune
It’s safe to say that “lose weight” and “quit smoking” are at the top of many a New Year’s resolution list. And they, sadly, top the failure list every year as well.
Not that it’s a contest, but some say weight loss is harder, because people can’t just “quit” eating. Others say quitting cigarettes is harder because it’s so physically addictive.
Either way, when you hear people say, about giving up unhealthy physical or mental habits, “I could never …” they truly believe it.
“Never” is not literally true, of course. If somebody were stranded on the South Pole without smokes or sweets, they would give them up. They’d have to. Or if somebody put a gun to their head and said, “eat that doughnut or smoke that cigarette, and I’ll shoot,” I’ll bet they could stop.
People can do it. They just really, really don’t want to.
Resolutions fail oftentimes because people are aiming at the wrong target — they fixate on the end product instead of resolving to follow a process. Because imagining the daily slog required for success is so less enjoyable than hazy fantasizing about the prize.
“Quit smoking” is tough, no doubt about it.
The idea that they can’t ever smoke another cigarette empowers some people and terrifies others.
That’s because there are cold turkey people and baby steps people.
Cold turkey people tend to be dramatic and competitive. These folks are the ones who will make the operatic gesture of ceremonially tossing out their last pack. This signals to the world that the gauntlet has been thrown. They have challenged the cigarette lover within them. Since they hate to lose, the next weeks will be a bloody spectacle. These are black-and-white folks — they will never have another cigarette or lapse back to two packs a day.
Baby steps people prefer stealth. They don’t appreciate commentary from the peanut gallery. It makes them uneasy to have others watch them sweat and struggle. They want to grind through the process alone to emerge one day quietly smoke-free.
Baby steps people can accept shades of gray, admitting that backsliding a few times will be part of the process.
But they persist, gradually narrowing their window for smoking — first the house is off-limits, then the car, then certain times of day. They sneak quietly away from cigarettes like a mom tiptoeing away from a baby who has finally fallen asleep.
Whichever type you are, one realization can boost your chance of success.
“Self-talk” matters.
When you’re already struggling to do something hard, coming down even harder on yourself when you falter or fail doesn’t necessary spur you on to greater commitment — it just adds another level of frustration and disappointment to carry. Then the temptation arises to just chuck it all and give up.
Instead of flogging yourself for setbacks, turn a 180 and praise yourself for making the effort. Applaud your spirit.
Despite your own resistance and those who want to sabotage your process, you have an intimate friend who supports your will to live healthier.
It’s yourself.
(Karen Herzog feels your pain. She had her last cigarette 39 years ago and still sometimes feels nostalgic for them.)
(Reach Karen Herzog at kherzogcolumn@gmail.com.)
http://bismarcktribune.com/news/columnists/karen-herzog/be-it-resolved-to-quit/article_de7c7e1e-717f-11e3-baf9-0019bb2963f4.html

Oregon cigarette tax goes up Jan. 1

Written by Peter Wong

Oregon’s cigarette tax will go up Jan. 1.
The actual tax is applied on individual cigarettes. The tax will go up from $1.18 to $1.31 on a standard pack of 20 cigarettes. It will be the first increase since 2004, when it actually dropped from $1.28 to $1.18 as the result of voter rejection of a ballot measure for a budget-balancing tax increase. It had been at $1.28 for a decade, but a 10-cent increment had to be renewed every two years, and expired in 2004.
Proceeds from cigarette taxes go to the Oregon Health Plan, the state general fund, and a special account for tobacco-use reduction. There are earmarked shares for cities, counties, special transportation for older people and people with disabilities, and now, mental health programs. Lawmakers added the latter category in a special session this year.
“Ordinarily, the consumer pays the tax as a part of the price when purchasing cigarettes from an Oregon retailer. Consumers must remember that they are responsible for filing and paying the tax on cigarettes purchased on-line or otherwise brought in from outside the state,” said Chris Wytoski, manager of Oregon’s tobacco tax program in the Department of Revenue.
There is also a $1.01 federal tax.
pwong@StatesmanJournal.com or (503) 399-6745 or twitter.com/capitolwong 
http://www.statesmanjournal.com/article/20131226/UPDATE/131226021/Oregon-cigarette-tax-goes-up-Jan-1